The Average Firm Now Has 17 Open Finance Roles: What the 2026 Talent Shortage Means for CPA Growth

A survey of finance and accounting leaders published this year by Personiv, and reported by Accounting Today, put the average number of open accounting and finance roles per company at 17. In 2025 it was five. In 2024 it was two. That is not a hiring market tightening. That is a hiring market that has stopped functioning the way firms assume it does.

The same research found 84 percent of senior leaders agreeing there is a talent shortage, against 63 percent in 2020. The hardest roles to fill were senior accountant at 43 percent, staff accountant at 26 percent and tax accountant at 11 percent. Over half of leaders, 51 percent, named rising salary expectations as their single biggest hiring challenge. The one number that moved in the other direction is telling: the share of firms taking 60 days or more to fill a role fell from 49 percent to 42 percent, which is what happens when firms lower the bar rather than when supply improves.

What does a jump from five open roles to 17 actually mean?

It means capacity has become the binding constraint on growth rather than demand. A firm with 17 unfilled seats cannot take on the work it is already being offered, so the question of how to win more clients stops being the urgent one. The practical consequence is that most firms are now competing on who can serve well, not on who can sell hardest.

That reframes marketing entirely. When a firm cannot staff the work it has, spending on undifferentiated lead generation makes things worse: it fills the pipeline with enquiries nobody can service, the response times slip, and the firm acquires a reputation for being slow. The firms that come through this period well are the ones that get deliberate about which work they want.

Should a short-staffed firm stop marketing?

No, but it should change what it markets for. The instinct when capacity is tight is to pull back on visibility until the hiring catches up. That reliably backfires, because rankings and reputation take months to build and decay quietly while you are not looking. The firm that goes quiet in 2026 is invisible in 2027, when it has staff again.

The better move is to shift from volume to selection. That means marketing built around the specific work a firm is set up to do profitably, rather than a general offer that attracts everything. Narrower positioning produces fewer enquiries and a much higher proportion of the right ones, which is exactly what a capacity-limited firm needs. The full framework for this sits in our complete guide to digital marketing for accounting firms.

Where does AI actually fit into the gap?

The same survey found the share of firms using AI to help address talent gaps rose from 23 percent in 2025 to 63 percent in 2026. That is a genuine shift in one year, and it is worth being precise about what it does and does not solve. AI is closing gaps in document handling, first-pass review, drafting and client communication. It is not producing senior accountants.

The honest framing is that automation buys back hours from the work that did not need a qualified person, so the qualified people you do have spend more of their week on advisory work clients will pay for. That is a real gain and it is measurable, but a firm that expects software to replace a senior hire will be disappointed. We set out where the practical wins are in our piece on how AI automation is saving small businesses hours every month.

Which clients are worth the capacity you have?

The ones whose work matches what the firm does repeatedly. Every practice has a client type it serves at good margin with little friction, and a long tail it serves out of habit at poor margin with a lot of friction. In a capacity crisis the long tail is not merely unprofitable. It is actively consuming the hours that the good work needs.

Most firms know which clients these are and are reluctant to act, usually because the fee income feels safer than the gap it would leave. The arithmetic in 2026 is different. With 17 seats unfilled, the constraint is hours rather than revenue, and an hour spent on a low-margin client is an hour not spent on a high-margin one. Pruning is a capacity decision before it is a commercial one.

How does a firm compete for the staff it does need?

Largely through the same channels it uses to reach clients. Candidates research firms the way buyers do. They look at the website, they read whatever the firm has published, and they form a view about whether it looks like a serious place to work. A practice whose site was last updated in 2021 is telling every applicant something it did not intend to say.

This is the part firms underinvest in most consistently. Recruitment gets treated as a job-board problem when it is substantially a positioning problem, and the same website design and development work that converts prospects converts applicants. With 51 percent of leaders naming salary expectations as their biggest obstacle, anything that makes a firm attractive on grounds other than pay is doing real financial work.

What does narrower positioning look like in practice?

It looks like being able to finish the sentence "we are the firm that ...". Most practice websites cannot. They list services, name sectors in passing, and describe the team as experienced, which is what every competitor also says. A buyer reading three such sites cannot tell them apart, so they default to price or proximity, and a firm with no capacity to spare has just been forced into the worst possible competition.

The narrower version names a client type and a situation. A firm that works mainly with construction subcontractors, or dental practices, or companies going through their first acquisition, is immediately legible. It also markets far more cheaply, because the content almost writes itself once you know exactly who is reading, and because the questions that client type asks are specific enough to rank for without fighting national competition.

The objection is always the same, which is that narrowing turns work away. In a normal market that is a fair concern. In a market where the average firm has 17 unfilled seats, turning work away is not a cost. It is the thing the firm needs to do anyway, and doing it deliberately through positioning is considerably better than doing it accidentally through slow replies and missed deadlines.

Does the advisory shift change the marketing?

It changes what the marketing has to argue. Compliance work sells on price and proximity because the output is standardised. Advisory work sells on judgement, which cannot be demonstrated in a services list. It has to be shown, which is why firms that publish specific, useful analysis of the changes hitting their clients convert far better than firms that publish a capabilities page.

We have watched this play out on narrow, timely topics. Posts written around a specific rule change consistently outperform general service pages for firms in this market, which is the same effect we documented when writing about the reversal of the 1099 reporting threshold for 2026 and the end of BOI reporting for US firms. Specific beats broad, particularly for firms without the authority to win broad terms yet.

Is the shortage likely to ease?

Not quickly. The pipeline problem is upstream of hiring: fewer accounting graduates, a licensure path that takes years, and a generation of experienced staff retiring faster than they are replaced. None of those respond to a salary increase within a single hiring cycle, which is why 51 percent of leaders naming pay as their biggest obstacle is a symptom rather than a diagnosis.

The one genuinely encouraging number, the fall in firms taking 60 days or more to fill a role from 49 percent to 42 percent, is easy to misread as improvement. It is at least as likely to reflect firms accepting candidates they would have passed over two years ago. Planning on the assumption that supply returns in 2027 is optimistic. Planning on the assumption that this is the normal operating environment for the next few years is prudent, and it changes what a firm builds.

What the next quarter looks like

Decide what the firm is for, in one sentence a client would recognise. Prune the long tail deliberately rather than by attrition. Put the automation where the unqualified hours are, not where the judgement is. Keep publishing through the crunch, because visibility built now is the pipeline for the year after the hiring market loosens. And treat the careers page as a marketing asset, because it is competing with every other firm's for the same short supply.

Triomatic Marketing builds the visibility side of this for accounting and CPA firms across the USA and UK. We are AI-powered and founder-led, and we would rather help a firm win the right twelve clients than the wrong hundred. The full picture for firms in this market sits on our page for digital marketing for CPA firms in the USA, and the specific ranking work is covered under search engine optimization. To talk it through, message Aria on WhatsApp via triomaticmarketing.com, or book a free 15-minute discovery call at https://calendly.com/hello-triomaticmarketing/15min.

Frequently asked questions

FAQs